[Wlug] Weird fs problem...

[Theo Van Dinter]

On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:11:15PM -0400, Tim Keller wrote:
> What do people recommend as tuning parameters and/or fs types for creating
> filesystems that have the potential to store massive ammounts of relatively
> small files?
> 
> Would I have been better suited to have this thing formatted with ReiserFS?

I prefer XFS in general, which in this case has no set inode number
limitation.  I've been burned numerous times by ReiserFS in the past,
whereas I haven't had any major XFS issues that I can recall.  fwiw.

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Veni, Vidi, Vice" - I came, I saw, I partied.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.wlug.org/pipermail/wlug/attachments/20060810/a93fbb64/attachment.bin