[Wlug] Redhat 9.0 ISO
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:04:23 -0500
I agree that bigger numbers are more impressive when the number is
between 0 and 10 but what will happen after 10? 12 does not seem that
impressive to me... 19? 34? may be 99? :)
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:54:32 -0500
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:51:38PM -0500, Gary Hanley wrote:
> > What! 9.0?
> > What happened to 8.1?
> RedHat is falling into the "bigger numbers are more impressive" trap.
> It's not even 9.0, it's just 9.
> I am still trying to download disc 1 from RHN. Was getting 5-8k/sec
> yesterday. Now at least I'm averaging 32k/sec. It's still pathetic,
> but better than before. Only another 5.6 ISOs to go. <sigh>
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "Neil hasn't locked and loaded anything other than a floppy disk."
> - Unknown at Collective Technologies Hiring Weekend (4/29/2000)