[Wlug] Procmail Question

[Theo Van Dinter]

--aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:13:18AM -0500, Peter Gutowski wrote:
> According to the man page the second ":" is optional, i.e.
>=20
> :0:
>=20
> but, as a sample of something known to work (from the SpamAssassin sample=
 .procmailrc) it does use the above syntax. Here's the example:
>=20
> So maybe the second ":" is not optional all the time?

Just so we're all clear, the second ":" tells procmail that is needs to
lock the file before writing to avoid corrupted mailboxes.  So it's a
good idea if you're writing to a mailbox, but isn't actually required,
especially if you're writing to /dev/null or something.

I didn't see anything wrong offhand with the procmail rules shown.  Can we
see the header of an example mail which doesn't work with the original but
works with the carbon copy method?  (and by work, just to double check,
we're talking about the message going into the "test" folder).

--=20
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"When it is not necessary to make a decision, it is necessary not to make a
 decision."               - From www.slashdot.org

--aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9y8hhAuOQUeWAs2MRAryFAKCtIIhhh7RsgOMYAGme94lr76mEkACgp59i
ry9aJFkfc3pDSH5s6hrIMhA=
=AcUQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx--